ANZTelecom (challenger)Scale · $100K
TPG Telecom

The challenger's service turnaround — agentic retention and care for TPG's Vodafone, TPG and iiNet brands

TPG Telecom sold its enterprise fibre business and returned capital, betting the company on consumer mobile and broadband across Vodafone, TPG, iiNet and felix — brands competing against Telstra's network halo and Optus's spend on price and value perception; an agentic frontline that saves renewal-window customers with full coverage, resolves service in-conversation, and restores the service reputation iiNet was once famous for is the highest-leverage investment a value challenger can make.

Entry use case
Churn-risk retention and renewal outreach across brands
Expected outcome
Contact 100% of at-risk and renewal-window customers with policy-bounded offers; measure save rates weekly against the current baseline.
Recommended next step
Propose a Scale retention pilot on one brand's expiring-contract cohort, measured on save rate versus the current outbound baseline.
What we understand

TPG Telecom's operating reality

TPG Telecom operates Australia's third mobile network with brands including Vodafone, TPG, iiNet, AAPT and felix, serving millions of mobile and broadband subscribers.

Public fact

TPG completed the sale of its Enterprise, Government and Wholesale fibre business to Vocus in 2025, returning capital and refocusing the company on consumer and small-business connectivity.

Public fact

As the value challenger against Telstra and Optus, TPG competes primarily on price and network-sharing-improved coverage, making churn management the central commercial discipline.

Public fact

iiNet built its brand historically on award-winning customer service — a reputation that decayed with scale and cost pressure, leaving nostalgia the company could reclaim.

Reasoned inference

A leaner post-divestment cost base means service and retention capacity are structurally thin relative to the subscriber base.

Reasoned inference

Multicultural segments (large Mandarin-, Vietnamese- and Arabic-speaking communities) are likely overrepresented in value brands and underserved in-language.

Seller hypothesis — validate

Validate with the account team before outreach: Current save-desk coverage rates and churn by brand · BSS consolidation state across Vodafone, TPG and iiNet stacks · Existing chatbot/IVR containment and vendor commitments · In-language service demand across multicultural segments

Build vs buy

Why we have a right to win here

Buy-led target

Limited internal ability or appetite to build the core platform — strong candidate for the packaged solution

Evidence: TPG is a lean challenger whose engineering is committed to network and BSS consolidation, not AI platforms; it has no internal LLM capability and a cost culture that buys proven capability — conversational retention and service is a classic governed buy.

Why they won't build the full stack: The post-divestment mandate is focus and cost discipline; building voice AI is the opposite of both, while a bought platform pays back within contract cycles on save-rate arithmetic alone.

What management is signalling

TPG completed the sale of its EGW fibre business to Vocus in 2025 and returned capital to shareholders, refocusing the company on consumer mobile and broadband.

Reported factpublic announcements and FY25 results · 2025

GTM implication: The company is now a pure consumer-economics story — churn and cost per contact are the levers that move the valuation, and both are exactly what the platform measures.

Mobile competition and cost-of-living-driven plan shopping keep churn pressure elevated across value brands.

Inferencerecent investor communications (validate) · 2025-2026

GTM implication: Anchor on renewal-window coverage: every expiring contract deserves a conversation before a comparison site decides the outcome.

What already exists (don't pitch this)
  • MyVodafone and brand apps with self-service
  • Multi-brand consumer estate across mobile and nbn broadband
  • Outbound save desks with limited coverage
  • Network-sharing arrangement improving regional coverage story
What customers still can't do end-to-end (pitch this)
  • →Full-coverage retention outreach across the at-risk base
  • →In-conversation billing and plan resolution at value-brand cost points
  • →Diagnostics-grounded fault triage that cuts repeat contacts
  • →In-language service for multicultural value segments
Opportunity map

Where agentic communications pays off first

WorkflowWhy it matters hereValueComplexitySpeedChannels
Churn-risk retention and renewal outreach
Full at-risk coverage with approved offers; save rates attributed weekly by brand and cohort.
Challenger economics live and die on churn; every save at policy-bounded cost beats the acquisition cost of replacing the subscriber.
Friction today: Save capacity covers a fraction of the at-risk base; most churn decisions happen without a conversation.
VoiceSMSApp chat
Consumer service and billing line
Routine service resolved in-conversation across brands; cost per contact drops to match value price points.
Routine billing and plan service at Australian labor cost erodes value-brand margins structurally.
Friction today: Service queues frustrate price-sensitive customers who churn rather than wait.
VoiceApp chat
nbn and mobile fault triage
Diagnostics-grounded triage with in-flow booking; repeat-contact volume drops.
Broadband fault calls are long, expensive and churn-inducing when unresolved.
Friction today: Script-based triage and nbn handoffs lose context and multiply repeat contacts.
VoiceApp chat
Watch the change

Churn-risk retention and renewal outreach across brands: today vs the agentic model

Scenario: A Vodafone customer's plan discount expires and a comparison site shows a cheaper rival; the agent calls before she ports, acknowledges the price gap, offers a policy-bounded plan with a loyalty data boost, executes it in the BSS on acceptance — and the port-out that was already half-decided never happens.
Today
same interaction, two worlds
Agentic layer
At-risk base contacted
capacity-limited fraction
100% attempted
Platform capability
Cost per contact
$13.50 median assisted
$1.84 median self-service
Benchmark
QA coverage
1–2% sampled
100% scored
Platform capability
Sources & assumptions
  • · At-risk base contacted: Platform capability; save rate measured in pilot
  • · Cost per contact: Gartner customer service cost benchmarks, 2024
  • · QA coverage: Platform capability: every interaction logged and evaluated
  • · Gartner, customer service cost benchmarks (2024): $13.50 median assisted vs $1.84 self-service per contact
  • · McKinsey, digital-first collections research: 20–25% NPL reduction among leaders; up to 40% opex reduction with gen AI
  • · Baymard Institute: ~70% average cart abandonment (meta-analysis)
  • · IAMAI–Kantar via IBEF (2025): 900M+ Indian internet users; 98% consume Indic-language content
  • · LeadSquared and vendor funnel studies: 78% of students choose the first institution to respond (directional, vendor data)
  • · HDI / ITSM operator benchmarks: $15–25 per L1 ticket; 40–60% of L1 volume is resets/status (validate per customer)
  • · Conventional-flow wait times and volumes are typical operator patterns — assumptions to replace with the customer's own baseline
  • · Agentic-flow behaviors (context retention, 100% logging, in-line policy checks) are platform capabilities, not projections
Recommended solution

One integrated stack, opinionated for this account

Channels · Tilicho Labs
VoiceSMSApp chat

Voice & channel orchestration, telephony, conversational execution, session/state, routing, integration build. Capability coverage validated during implementation.

Intelligence · Google Cloud
Gemini reasoningEnterprise groundingWorkflow agentsMulti-agent orchestrationGoverned actionsEvaluation & analytics
Systems · TPG Telecom
CRMChurn modelsOffer matrixBSSBillingNetwork diagnosticsnbn interfacesField scheduling

API access to these systems is the critical-path dependency.

Trust & languages
EnglishMandarinVietnamese

Identity-bound sessions, policy-bounded actions, 100% audit logging, human approvals at defined points, in-tenant intelligence.

Business case

The economics, with your numbers

Addressable monthly interactions1.2M
Seller assumption — replace in discovery
Current cost per interaction ($)$6.5
Industry benchmark scale — validate
Automation / assistance rate (%)55%
Seller assumption — pilot proves this
$7.8M
Current operating cost / mo
$48.7M
Modelled gross benefit / yr
0.0 mo
Payback on Scale
1735%
3-yr ROI (modelled)
Automated/assisted interactions per month660K
Modelled AI run-cost per month (usage + cloud, system estimate)$231K
New monthly operating cost$3.7M

All figures are modelling estimates from the labeled inputs above — nothing here is customer-provided yet. The pilot's first job is replacing these assumptions with TPG Telecom's measured baseline. Package price covers implementation only; recurring usage billed separately.

Recommended package

Scale — $100K implementation

Scale · $100K · A multi-channel production deployment10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows

Why this package for TPG Telecom: Retention outreach plus consumer service across a multi-brand estate are natural Scale scope — two to three workflows, shared BSS integration, brand-by-brand rollout.

Included
  • 4–6 channels
  • 2–3 priority workflows
  • Multiple enterprise integrations
  • API credential & security setup
  • Advanced orchestration
  • Multilingual support
  • Agent Assist / human escalation
  • Production analytics
  • Expansion roadmap
Not included
  • ✕Usage & consumption (billed separately)
  • ✕Enterprise-wide governance build-out
  • ✕Multi-BU rollout
Recurring costs (separate from the package)

Packages cover implementation and integration only. Recurring costs are billed separately: Tilicho Labs platform usage (~$0.15/call-min indicative, usage only), Google Cloud consumption, telephony/carrier charges, managed operations, and support & optimization. No package includes unlimited usage.

Customer resources required
  • · API access + credentials for: CRM, Churn models, Offer matrix
  • · A named business owner for churn-risk retention and renewal outreach across brands
  • · Security review counterpart and policy sign-off (CRM scope)
  • · Baseline metrics for the pilot's success thresholds
Executive messages

What to say to whom

CEO

“Post-divestment, TPG is a pure consumer bet; churn is the single number that decides whether that bet pays, and full-coverage agentic retention is the biggest churn lever you haven't yet pulled.”

CIO / CTO

“A governed agent layer over the consolidated BSS estate serves all brands from one deployment — bounded integration, benchmarkable against your current chatbot containment.”

COO

“Lean operations was the point of the restructure; elastic service capacity keeps it lean while finally covering the whole at-risk base instead of a dialer-limited sample.”

Head of Consumer / Retention

“Every churn decision made without a conversation is a silent loss; an agent that reaches everyone with offer discipline turns your save rate into a population metric.”

Chief Risk / Compliance Officer

“TCP Code alignment, approved-offer enforcement, vulnerable-customer routing and 100% logging — retention discipline with audit evidence, not commission-driven improvisation.”

CFO / Procurement

“Save-rate lift against subscriber lifetime value is the cleanest ROI in telecom; the pilot measures it in six weeks with usage-based run cost.”

Outreach

Pre-built offer emails for TPG Telecom

Written from this account's own research — the strategic signal, the capability gap, the entry workflow, and the modelled economics — not a mail-merge template. Pick the moment and the persona, edit anything, then copy or open in your mail client.

Moment in the deal
Cold outreach — no prior conversation
Who it's addressed to
Cares about: The workflow itself and its daily failure modes
Register
Length
Draft — edit freely before sending
Open in mail client

Customer-safe by construction: drafts are composed only from customer-facing fields. Account tier, build-vs-buy classification, priority score, internal routing, and partner-commercial detail are not inputs to the composer, so they cannot appear in a draft. Money figures are always framed as modelled from the customer's own volumes. Read before sending — you own what goes out.

The pursuit

Tier 2 — high-potential incubation

Why this tier

Australia's third mobile operator across Vodafone, TPG, iiNet and felix — slimmed to a consumer-and-mobile focus after selling its enterprise fibre assets, with challenger economics that make cost per contact and churn the whole ballgame.

Recommended next step

Propose a Scale retention pilot on one brand's expiring-contract cohort, measured on save rate versus the current outbound baseline.

Entry: Churn-risk retention and renewal outreach across brands · Scale package · 10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows. Human fallback throughout; success thresholds agreed before build.

Start the pursuit

Research-based priority-account universe assembled from public information, market scale, communication volume, and solution fit. This is NOT an authoritative list of top Google Cloud customers; existing Google Cloud relationships are noted only where publicly reported. Validate every account with the account team before outreach.