ANZTelecomTransform · $200K
Telstra

Onshore service at software economics — agentic frontline capacity for Telstra's Connected Future 30 era

Telstra promised Australia it would answer consumer calls onshore and promised investors positive operating leverage through 2030 — two commitments that collide in the contact center, where Australian labor makes every human call among the most expensive in APJ; an agentic frontline that resolves routine service in-conversation keeps the onshore promise, delivers the cost trajectory Connected Future 30 requires, and slots into an AI agenda Telstra has already declared through its Accenture joint venture.

Entry use case
Consumer service and billing line (My Telstra overflow)
Expected outcome
Resolve the routine majority of consumer service calls in-conversation onshore, cutting cost per contact while protecting the onshore-answering commitment.
Recommended next step
Executive briefing aligned to the Connected Future 30 cost agenda: baseline consumer-line economics under the onshore commitment, then scope a benchmarked deployment alongside existing AI initiatives.
What we understand

Telstra's operating reality

Telstra is Australia's largest telecommunications provider, reporting FY25 statutory profit up sharply on strong mobile performance and disciplined cost reduction.

Public fact

The Connected Future 30 strategy, announced in 2025, commits to positive operating leverage — income growing faster than costs — through fiscal 2030, with AI named as a core enabler.

Public fact

Telstra formed a joint venture with Accenture to accelerate AI adoption across the business, one of the most public AI commitments by any Australian enterprise.

Public fact

Telstra publicly committed to answering consumer calls in Australia, ending offshore contact-center answering for consumer lines — a politically popular but cost-heavy promise.

Public fact

Workforce reductions through FY25 drew union and political attention, making 'AI instead of offshoring' a narrative that must be handled with care — automation of routine contacts while onshore humans handle complex care is the defensible framing.

Reasoned inference

The My Telstra app is mature, so remaining call volume skews toward the complex, the elderly and the frustrated — exactly the contacts where conversational quality matters most.

Reasoned inference

Validate with the account team before outreach: Scope of the Accenture JV and whether frontline conversational AI is already claimed within it · Current containment rates of existing IVR/chatbot estate · Union and stakeholder sensitivities around automation sequencing · Which brand or queue is most winnable as an entry point

Build vs buy

Why we have a right to win here

Partner-led target

Technically capable but needs industry workflows, integration, acceleration, or managed operations

Evidence: Telstra has genuine technology capability and has organized its AI ambition through partnership — most visibly the Accenture joint venture — rather than pure internal build; it will adopt best-of-breed platforms inside partner-delivered governance, making a benchmarkable Gemini frontline a natural fit for how Telstra already buys AI.

Why they won't build the full stack: Telstra's declared model is partnered acceleration, not building LLM voice infrastructure from scratch; the Connected Future 30 clock rewards production-grade frontline economics now, and a governed platform can be benchmarked head-to-head inside the AI program without competing with it.

What management is signalling

Telstra reported FY25 statutory NPAT up around 31% with operating expenses reduced through disciplined cost programs, and launched the Connected Future 30 strategy committing to positive operating leverage with AI as a named enabler.

Reported factFY25 annual results and strategy announcements · Aug 2025

GTM implication: Frontline automation is the largest unclaimed contributor to the publicly promised cost trajectory — sell directly against the operating-leverage commitment.

Telstra's AI joint venture with Accenture signals board-level commitment to AI-driven transformation at scale.

Reported factpublic announcements · 2025

GTM implication: Enter as a benchmarkable best-of-breed engine inside the declared AI agenda, not as a competing platform decision.

Workforce reductions and the onshore-answering commitment keep automation politically sensitive.

Inferencepublic reporting · 2025

GTM implication: Frame as onshore service made economically sustainable — automation of routine contacts funding better human care for complex ones.

What already exists (don't pitch this)
  • My Telstra app with mature self-service and messaging
  • Onshore consumer contact centers per public commitment
  • IVR and chatbot deflection on consumer lines
  • Accenture AI joint venture and declared AI-first ambitions
What customers still can't do end-to-end (pitch this)
  • →In-conversation resolution for the app-resistant cohort that still calls
  • →Elastic capacity without offshore levers
  • →In-language service depth for multicultural Australia
  • →Full-coverage retention outreach with offer discipline
Opportunity map

Where agentic communications pays off first

WorkflowWhy it matters hereValueComplexitySpeedChannels
Consumer service and billing line
Routine calls resolved in-conversation with My Telstra actions executed; human agents concentrate on complex care.
Routine billing, plan and account calls carry full Australian labor cost under the onshore commitment — the widest cost-to-value gap in the estate.
Friction today: App-mature customers who still call are calling for a reason; IVR deflection frustrates precisely this cohort.
VoiceApp chatWeb
Technical and nbn fault triage
Diagnostics-grounded triage resolves routine faults; genuine faults logged with full context and booked visits.
Connection and nbn faults are the longest-AHT class and drive avoidable truck-roll costs.
Friction today: Diagnostics require agents walking customers through steps; handoffs to nbn processes lose context.
VoiceApp chat
Plan-review retention and multicultural service
Policy-bounded retention conversations at full coverage, with in-language service for major migrant communities.
Cost-of-living pressure drives plan-shopping churn, and multicultural Australia is underserved in-language.
Friction today: Retention outreach is capacity-limited; in-language service depends on scarce specialist staff.
VoiceSMSApp chat
Watch the change

Consumer service and billing line (My Telstra overflow): today vs the agentic model

Scenario: A pensioner calls about a bill that rose after a discount expired; the agent explains the change plainly, moves her to a cheaper plan that fits her usage within policy, confirms the next bill amount and flags the vulnerable-customer marker for her file — resolved onshore, in one call, at software cost.
Today
same interaction, two worlds
Agentic layer
First-contact resolution
deferred via tickets
in-conversation actions
Platform capability
Cost per contact
$13.50 median assisted
$1.84 median self-service
Benchmark
QA coverage
1–2% sampled
100% scored
Platform capability
Sources & assumptions
  • · First-contact resolution: Process design: agent acts in systems of record
  • · Cost per contact: Gartner customer service cost benchmarks, 2024
  • · QA coverage: Platform capability: every interaction logged and evaluated
  • · Gartner, customer service cost benchmarks (2024): $13.50 median assisted vs $1.84 self-service per contact
  • · McKinsey, digital-first collections research: 20–25% NPL reduction among leaders; up to 40% opex reduction with gen AI
  • · Baymard Institute: ~70% average cart abandonment (meta-analysis)
  • · IAMAI–Kantar via IBEF (2025): 900M+ Indian internet users; 98% consume Indic-language content
  • · LeadSquared and vendor funnel studies: 78% of students choose the first institution to respond (directional, vendor data)
  • · HDI / ITSM operator benchmarks: $15–25 per L1 ticket; 40–60% of L1 volume is resets/status (validate per customer)
  • · Conventional-flow wait times and volumes are typical operator patterns — assumptions to replace with the customer's own baseline
  • · Agentic-flow behaviors (context retention, 100% logging, in-line policy checks) are platform capabilities, not projections
Recommended solution

One integrated stack, opinionated for this account

Channels · Tilicho Labs
VoiceApp chatWebSMS

Voice & channel orchestration, telephony, conversational execution, session/state, routing, integration build. Capability coverage validated during implementation.

Intelligence · Google Cloud
Gemini reasoningEnterprise groundingWorkflow agentsMulti-agent orchestrationGoverned actionsEvaluation & analytics
Systems · Telstra
BSSBillingCRMNetwork diagnosticsnbn interfacesField schedulingOffer matrix

API access to these systems is the critical-path dependency.

Trust & languages
EnglishMandarinVietnameseArabic

Identity-bound sessions, policy-bounded actions, 100% audit logging, human approvals at defined points, in-tenant intelligence.

Business case

The economics, with your numbers

Addressable monthly interactions3.5M
Seller assumption — replace in discovery
Current cost per interaction ($)$8.0
Industry benchmark scale — validate
Automation / assistance rate (%)55%
Seller assumption — pilot proves this
$28.0M
Current operating cost / mo
$176.7M
Modelled gross benefit / yr
0.0 mo
Payback on Transform
2167%
3-yr ROI (modelled)
Automated/assisted interactions per month1.9M
Modelled AI run-cost per month (usage + cloud, system estimate)$674K
New monthly operating cost$13.3M

All figures are modelling estimates from the labeled inputs above — nothing here is customer-provided yet. The pilot's first job is replacing these assumptions with Telstra's measured baseline. Package price covers implementation only; recurring usage billed separately.

Recommended package

Transform — $200K implementation

Transform · $200K · A broader enterprise deployment14–20 weeks phased across units

Why this package for Telstra: Telstra's scale, multi-brand estate and declared AI ambition justify enterprise scope — consumer service, technical triage and retention across channels, deployed inside the governance its AI partnerships already establish.

Included
  • 7–10 channels
  • Multiple inbound + outbound workflows
  • Complex enterprise integrations
  • Multiple business units or geographies
  • Advanced agent orchestration
  • Enterprise grounding
  • Governance & evaluation framework
  • Role-based human supervision
  • Custom analytics & optimization
  • Production hardening + managed rollout plan
Not included
  • ✕Usage & consumption (billed separately)
  • ✕Ongoing managed operations (contracted separately)
Recurring costs (separate from the package)

Packages cover implementation and integration only. Recurring costs are billed separately: Tilicho Labs platform usage (~$0.15/call-min indicative, usage only), Google Cloud consumption, telephony/carrier charges, managed operations, and support & optimization. No package includes unlimited usage.

Customer resources required
  • · API access + credentials for: BSS, Billing, CRM
  • · A named business owner for consumer service and billing line (my telstra overflow)
  • · Security review counterpart and policy sign-off (BSS scope)
  • · Baseline metrics for the pilot's success thresholds
Executive messages

What to say to whom

CEO

“Connected Future 30 promises operating leverage with AI named as the engine; the consumer frontline is where that promise meets the largest addressable cost pool — and where the onshore commitment makes the economics unanswerable.”

CIO / CTO

“You've built the AI governance and delivery muscle through the Accenture JV; a Gemini-powered frontline is a benchmarkable engine inside that framework — best-of-breed pragmatism, not a competing platform bet.”

COO

“Onshore answering plus Australian labor costs set a per-contact floor no efficiency program can break — except removing the routine contact from human queues entirely while your people handle complex care.”

Head of Consumer / Customer Service

“The customers still calling after a decade of My Telstra investment are calling because they need conversation; an agent that actually resolves — not deflects — is the first deflection-free automation story you can stand behind.”

Chief Risk / Compliance Officer

“TCP Code and Privacy Act alignment, vulnerable-customer routing to humans, approved-offer enforcement and 100% logging — stronger conduct evidence than sampled QA across an outsourced estate.”

CFO / Procurement

“You've publicly committed to income growing faster than costs every year to FY30; measured cost-per-resolved-contact reduction on the consumer line is among the largest single levers available to that equation.”

Outreach

Pre-built offer emails for Telstra

Written from this account's own research — the strategic signal, the capability gap, the entry workflow, and the modelled economics — not a mail-merge template. Pick the moment and the persona, edit anything, then copy or open in your mail client.

Moment in the deal
Cold outreach — no prior conversation
Who it's addressed to
Cares about: The workflow itself and its daily failure modes
Register
Length
Draft — edit freely before sending
Open in mail client

Customer-safe by construction: drafts are composed only from customer-facing fields. Account tier, build-vs-buy classification, priority score, internal routing, and partner-commercial detail are not inputs to the composer, so they cannot appear in a draft. Money figures are always framed as modelled from the customer's own volumes. Read before sending — you own what goes out.

The pursuit

Tier 1 — immediate strategic pursuit

Why this tier

Australia's largest telco, fresh off a strong FY25 and into the Connected Future 30 strategy with AI explicitly central — plus a public commitment to answer consumer calls onshore that makes Australian labor cost per contact the highest in the region.

30 / 60 / 90-day plan
  • Day 0–30: Executive briefing aligned to the Connected Future 30 cost agenda: baseline consumer-line economics under the onshore commitment, then scope a benchmarked deployment alongside existing AI initiatives.; confirm sponsor and baseline data access; validate: Scope of the Accenture JV and whether frontline conversational AI is already claimed within it
  • Day 31–60: architecture & security review with the platform team; Tilicho Labs scoping on Voice + App chat; pilot scope signed
  • Day 61–90: Transform package kickoff; consumer service and billing line (my telstra overflow) pilot in build; success thresholds locked with the Head of Consumer / Customer Service
Recommended next step

Executive briefing aligned to the Connected Future 30 cost agenda: baseline consumer-line economics under the onshore commitment, then scope a benchmarked deployment alongside existing AI initiatives.

Entry: Consumer service and billing line (My Telstra overflow) · Transform package · 14–20 weeks phased across units. Human fallback throughout; success thresholds agreed before build.

Start the pursuit

Research-based priority-account universe assembled from public information, market scale, communication volume, and solution fit. This is NOT an authoritative list of top Google Cloud customers; existing Google Cloud relationships are noted only where publicly reported. Validate every account with the account team before outreach.