PhilippinesTelecomScale · $100K
PLDT / Smart

Fewer truck rolls, calmer storm days: agentic service for the Philippines' biggest home-fiber and mobile estate

PLDT Home's fiber base and Smart's prepaid millions generate the country's heaviest service load; agentic triage, scheduling, and outage communications cut truck rolls and absorb typhoon-day surges.

Entry use case
Home-fiber repair triage & appointment management
Expected outcome
Avoided truck rolls through conversational triage and reduced inbound during outage events
Recommended next step
Operations workshop with PLDT Home leadership: quantify remote-resolvable dispatch share and scope a triage-plus-appointments pilot in one region.
What we understand

PLDT / Smart's operating reality

PLDT is the Philippines' incumbent telecom group: PLDT Home leads fixed broadband, Smart serves tens of millions of mobile subscribers, and the enterprise arm anchors corporate connectivity.

Public fact

Typhoons and grid outages regularly hit Philippine networks; storm-driven service disruption is an annual operational certainty.

Public fact

Home-fiber repair economics are dominated by truck rolls, many dispatched for issues remote triage could resolve.

Reasoned inference

Legacy fixed-line systems alongside modern mobile stacks make integration surface area a real evaluation factor.

Reasoned inference

Smart's prepaid base carries the same promo-and-load contact intensity as the wider Philippine market.

Reasoned inference

Validate with the account team before outreach: Diagnostics/OSS API availability for conversational triage · Current dispatch volumes and the share resolvable remotely · Cloud posture and incumbent CX vendors across Home and Smart

Build vs buy

Why we have a right to win here

Partner-led target

Technically capable but needs industry workflows, integration, acceleration, or managed operations

Evidence: The incumbent runs a large IT estate but sources platforms from vendors; with capex under publicly stated discipline, a consumption-priced partner solution fits the declared financial posture far better than any internal platform build.

Why they won't build the full stack: Legacy-stack complexity would make an internal build slow and risky, and management's deleveraging and free-cash-flow commitments leave no room for speculative platform engineering — buying outcomes above existing systems is the aligned move.

What management is signalling

FY2025 capex fell to about PHP60 billion from PHP78 billion the prior year, with management guiding continued capex discipline, deleveraging, and positive free cash flow into 2026.

Reported factFY2025 earnings call · Feb 2026

GTM implication: Sell opex reduction with no capex profile: consumption-priced conversations and avoided truck rolls drop straight into the free-cash-flow story management has committed to.

What already exists (don't pitch this)
  • myPLDT Home and Smart apps
  • Existing hotlines and chatbot deflection
  • Field-service operations for the fiber estate
What customers still can't do end-to-end (pitch this)
  • →Conversational fiber triage before technician dispatch
  • →Area-specific proactive outage and restoration updates
  • →In-channel load and promo completion for Smart prepaid
  • →Cross-brand context between Home and Smart
Opportunity map

Where agentic communications pays off first

WorkflowWhy it matters hereValueComplexitySpeedChannels
Fiber repair triage & appointments
Conversational diagnostics resolve remote-fixable issues; the rest get managed appointments with proactive updates.
Every avoided truck roll is direct opex; every kept appointment protects a technician-day.
Friction today: 'No internet' calls dispatch technicians without structured remote triage; reschedules churn through queues.
VoiceViber/WhatsAppSMS
Storm & outage communications
Proactive, area-specific outage and restoration updates that suppress repeat inbound.
Typhoon days multiply inbound exactly when lines and staff are most strained.
Friction today: Customers call repeatedly for restoration estimates no one can personally give.
SMSViber/WhatsAppVoice
Smart prepaid load & promo service
In-channel balance, promo, and load completion in Taglish and Cebuano.
The highest-volume mobile intents, where cost per contact must match sachet ARPU.
Friction today: IVR and app flows leave a costly voice tail.
VoiceIn-app
Watch the change

Home-fiber repair triage & appointment management: today vs the agentic model

Scenario: After a typhoon crosses Luzon, every affected PLDT Home customer gets area-specific restoration updates by Viber — and the hotline handles a fraction of its usual storm-day load.
Today
same interaction, two worlds
Agentic layer
First-contact resolution
deferred via tickets
in-conversation actions
Platform capability
Cost per contact
$13.50 median assisted
$1.84 median self-service
Benchmark
QA coverage
1–2% sampled
100% scored
Platform capability
Sources & assumptions
  • · First-contact resolution: Process design: agent acts in systems of record
  • · Cost per contact: Gartner customer service cost benchmarks, 2024
  • · QA coverage: Platform capability: every interaction logged and evaluated
  • · Gartner, customer service cost benchmarks (2024): $13.50 median assisted vs $1.84 self-service per contact
  • · McKinsey, digital-first collections research: 20–25% NPL reduction among leaders; up to 40% opex reduction with gen AI
  • · Baymard Institute: ~70% average cart abandonment (meta-analysis)
  • · IAMAI–Kantar via IBEF (2025): 900M+ Indian internet users; 98% consume Indic-language content
  • · LeadSquared and vendor funnel studies: 78% of students choose the first institution to respond (directional, vendor data)
  • · HDI / ITSM operator benchmarks: $15–25 per L1 ticket; 40–60% of L1 volume is resets/status (validate per customer)
  • · Conventional-flow wait times and volumes are typical operator patterns — assumptions to replace with the customer's own baseline
  • · Agentic-flow behaviors (context retention, 100% logging, in-line policy checks) are platform capabilities, not projections
Recommended solution

One integrated stack, opinionated for this account

Channels · Tilicho Labs
VoiceViber/WhatsAppSMSIn-app

Voice & channel orchestration, telephony, conversational execution, session/state, routing, integration build. Capability coverage validated during implementation.

Intelligence · Google Cloud
Gemini reasoningEnterprise groundingWorkflow agentsMulti-agent orchestrationGoverned actionsEvaluation & analytics
Systems · PLDT / Smart
OSS/diagnosticsField-service managementNetwork statusOutage managementCharging systemPromo catalog

API access to these systems is the critical-path dependency.

Trust & languages
Filipino/TagalogEnglishCebuano

Identity-bound sessions, policy-bounded actions, 100% audit logging, human approvals at defined points, in-tenant intelligence.

Business case

The economics, with your numbers

Addressable monthly interactions4.5M
Seller assumption — replace in discovery
Current cost per interaction ($)$0.9
Industry benchmark scale — validate
Automation / assistance rate (%)55%
Seller assumption — pilot proves this
$4.0M
Current operating cost / mo
$16.3M
Modelled gross benefit / yr
0.1 mo
Payback on Scale
156%
3-yr ROI (modelled)
Automated/assisted interactions per month2.5M
Modelled AI run-cost per month (usage + cloud, system estimate)$866K
New monthly operating cost$2.7M

All figures are modelling estimates from the labeled inputs above — nothing here is customer-provided yet. The pilot's first job is replacing these assumptions with PLDT / Smart's measured baseline. Package price covers implementation only; recurring usage billed separately.

Recommended package

Scale — $100K implementation

Scale · $100K · A multi-channel production deployment10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows

Why this package for PLDT / Smart: Fiber service, mobile prepaid, and outage communications are distinct workflows across two business units — a Scale engagement with staged rollout fits the incumbent's cadence.

Included
  • 4–6 channels
  • 2–3 priority workflows
  • Multiple enterprise integrations
  • API credential & security setup
  • Advanced orchestration
  • Multilingual support
  • Agent Assist / human escalation
  • Production analytics
  • Expansion roadmap
Not included
  • ✕Usage & consumption (billed separately)
  • ✕Enterprise-wide governance build-out
  • ✕Multi-BU rollout
Recurring costs (separate from the package)

Packages cover implementation and integration only. Recurring costs are billed separately: Tilicho Labs platform usage (~$0.15/call-min indicative, usage only), Google Cloud consumption, telephony/carrier charges, managed operations, and support & optimization. No package includes unlimited usage.

Customer resources required
  • · API access + credentials for: OSS/diagnostics, Field-service management, Network status
  • · A named business owner for home-fiber repair triage & appointment management
  • · Security review counterpart and policy sign-off (OSS/diagnostics scope)
  • · Baseline metrics for the pilot's success thresholds
Executive messages

What to say to whom

CEO

“Service reliability perception decides the fiber war. Proactive, honest outage communication at scale is a brand weapon only automation can wield on storm days.”

CIO / CTO

“The agentic layer sits above legacy and modern stacks alike, grounding in diagnostics and field-service APIs without forcing a systems consolidation first.”

COO

“Truck rolls and storm surges are your two costliest operational patterns; conversational triage and proactive comms attack both directly.”

Head of Home / Consumer Business

“A managed appointment with proactive updates is the difference between a kept promise and a detractor — at fiber-subscriber scale.”

Chief Risk / Compliance Officer

“Consistent, logged customer communications during outages strengthen your NTC and consumer-protection posture rather than straining it.”

CFO / Procurement

“Avoided truck rolls are the cleanest ROI in telecom; the pilot counts them explicitly against conversational-triage cost.”

Outreach

Pre-built offer emails for PLDT / Smart

Written from this account's own research — the strategic signal, the capability gap, the entry workflow, and the modelled economics — not a mail-merge template. Pick the moment and the persona, edit anything, then copy or open in your mail client.

Moment in the deal
Cold outreach — no prior conversation
Who it's addressed to
Cares about: The workflow itself and its daily failure modes
Register
Length
Draft — edit freely before sending
Open in mail client

Customer-safe by construction: drafts are composed only from customer-facing fields. Account tier, build-vs-buy classification, priority score, internal routing, and partner-commercial detail are not inputs to the composer, so they cannot appear in a draft. Money figures are always framed as modelled from the customer's own volumes. Read before sending — you own what goes out.

The pursuit

Tier 2 — high-potential incubation

Why this tier

The Philippines' incumbent fixed-and-mobile group: the largest home-fiber base plus Smart's tens of millions of mobile users — enormous service estate, complex legacy stack, deliberate buyer.

Recommended next step

Operations workshop with PLDT Home leadership: quantify remote-resolvable dispatch share and scope a triage-plus-appointments pilot in one region.

Entry: Home-fiber repair triage & appointment management · Scale package · 10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows. Human fallback throughout; success thresholds agreed before build.

Start the pursuit

Research-based priority-account universe assembled from public information, market scale, communication volume, and solution fit. This is NOT an authoritative list of top Google Cloud customers; existing Google Cloud relationships are noted only where publicly reported. Validate every account with the account team before outreach.