ANZTelecomScale · $100K
Optus

Rebuilding trust call by call — an agentic frontline for Optus's retention fight and service recovery

After the breach, the national outage and the triple-zero failure, every Optus service interaction is a referendum on whether to stay; an agentic frontline that answers instantly, resolves consistently and proactively reaches at-risk customers is the fastest way to turn the service experience from churn driver into the proof point of a changed Optus.

Entry use case
Churn-risk retention and save desk
Expected outcome
Reach 100% of at-risk customers with timely, policy-bounded retention conversations and measurably reduce port-outs to Telstra and TPG.
Recommended next step
Executive session with retention and CX leadership: baseline port-out and save-rate data, then scope a Scale deployment starting with the at-risk cohort ahead of the next contract-renewal wave.
What we understand

Optus's operating reality

Optus, owned by Singtel, suffered a 2022 cyberattack exposing millions of customers' data, a nationwide network outage in November 2023 that led to a CEO resignation, and a 2025 triple-zero emergency-call failure that drew regulatory investigation and public outrage.

Public fact

Australian regulators (ACMA among them) have intensified scrutiny of Optus's operational resilience and emergency-call obligations.

Public fact

Churn pressure from Telstra, TPG and MVNOs is elevated whenever Optus is in the headlines; win-back and save capability is a strategic gap.

Reasoned inference

Australia's multicultural base — large Mandarin, Vietnamese, Arabic, Hindi and Punjabi-speaking communities — is underserved by English-only support queues.

Reasoned inference

Contact-center costs in Australia are among the region's highest, making the automation delta per contact larger than in any Asian market.

Public fact

Internal morale and agent attrition likely worsened through the crisis years, compounding staffing costs and consistency problems.

Seller hypothesis — validate

Validate with the account team before outreach: Current churn cohort sizes and save-desk coverage rates · Singtel group cloud and AI vendor strategy as it applies to Optus · Regulatory sensitivities around automated outbound post triple-zero investigation · Existing CCaaS stack and contract timelines

Build vs buy

Why we have a right to win here

Buy-led target

Limited internal ability or appetite to build the core platform — strong candidate for the packaged solution

Evidence: Optus is a network operator in cost-recovery mode, not an AI platform builder: years of crisis remediation, Singtel-level cost discipline and rebuilding regulatory trust consume its technology capacity — it needs a proven, governed platform delivered fast, not an internal build program.

Why they won't build the full stack: Post-breach, post-outage and post-triple-zero, every internal engineering dollar is committed to network resilience and security remediation under regulator scrutiny; building conversational-AI infrastructure in-house is neither credible nor fundable when the retention fight is measured in quarters.

What management is signalling

The 2022 data breach, November 2023 national outage and 2025 triple-zero failure produced sustained churn pressure, regulatory action and public commentary from parent Singtel on Optus's recovery and performance.

Reported factSingtel investor communications and public disclosures · 2023-2025

GTM implication: Position the agentic frontline as the operational proof of the turnaround — instant, consistent, multilingual service as the visible evidence of a changed Optus, with auditability regulators can inspect.

Cost pressure across the Singtel group keeps Optus's contact-center spend — Australia's most expensive service labor — under sustained scrutiny.

Inferencerecent investor communications (validate) · 2025-2026

GTM implication: Lead with the region's largest automation delta per contact: Australian labor costs make the pilot ROI faster here than in any Asian market.

What already exists (don't pitch this)
  • My Optus app with self-service account management and messaging-based support
  • IVR and chatbot deflection on service lines
  • Digital-first sub-brands and online sales channels
  • Incident SMS communication capability
What customers still can't do end-to-end (pitch this)
  • →Transactional depth — billing fixes and plan changes still land in expensive human queues
  • →Proactive, policy-bounded retention outreach at population scale
  • →Multilingual service for Australia's Mandarin, Vietnamese, Arabic, Hindi and Punjabi-speaking communities
  • →Consistent incident communication that scales during outages
Opportunity map

Where agentic communications pays off first

WorkflowWhy it matters hereValueComplexitySpeedChannels
Churn-risk retention and save desk
Full at-risk coverage with consistent, policy-bounded saves; port-out rate measurably bends.
Every crisis headline converts silent customers into active shoppers; the save conversation is where the trust rebuild succeeds or fails.
Friction today: Save teams are capacity-limited and reactive; most port-outs complete without a single meaningful retention attempt.
VoiceSMSApp chat
Billing and plan service line
Instant, accurate billing resolution in the customer's language; cost per contact drops sharply.
Bill-shock and plan-confusion calls dominate routine volume at Australia's highest per-contact labor costs.
Friction today: IVR deflection frustrates customers already primed to distrust Optus; wait times feed the churn cycle.
VoiceApp chatWeb
Outage and incident communication desk
Proactive, accurate incident outreach and elastic inbound absorption; regulator-visible communication discipline.
Optus's crises became catastrophes partly through poor mass communication; proactive incident conversations are now a resilience requirement.
Friction today: During incidents, inbound floods overwhelm capacity exactly when clear answers matter most.
SMSVoiceApp chat
Watch the change

Churn-risk retention and save desk: today vs the agentic model

Scenario: A Melbourne family flagged by the churn model after the latest outage gets a proactive call in Vietnamese; the agent acknowledges the incident, checks their plan against usage, applies an approved loyalty credit and books a human specialist for the NBN question — the port-out never happens.
Today
same interaction, two worlds
Agentic layer
At-risk base contacted
capacity-limited fraction
100% attempted
Platform capability
Cost per contact
$13.50 median assisted
$1.84 median self-service
Benchmark
QA coverage
1–2% sampled
100% scored
Platform capability
Sources & assumptions
  • · At-risk base contacted: Platform capability; save rate measured in pilot
  • · Cost per contact: Gartner customer service cost benchmarks, 2024
  • · QA coverage: Platform capability: every interaction logged and evaluated
  • · Gartner, customer service cost benchmarks (2024): $13.50 median assisted vs $1.84 self-service per contact
  • · McKinsey, digital-first collections research: 20–25% NPL reduction among leaders; up to 40% opex reduction with gen AI
  • · Baymard Institute: ~70% average cart abandonment (meta-analysis)
  • · IAMAI–Kantar via IBEF (2025): 900M+ Indian internet users; 98% consume Indic-language content
  • · LeadSquared and vendor funnel studies: 78% of students choose the first institution to respond (directional, vendor data)
  • · HDI / ITSM operator benchmarks: $15–25 per L1 ticket; 40–60% of L1 volume is resets/status (validate per customer)
  • · Conventional-flow wait times and volumes are typical operator patterns — assumptions to replace with the customer's own baseline
  • · Agentic-flow behaviors (context retention, 100% logging, in-line policy checks) are platform capabilities, not projections
Recommended solution

One integrated stack, opinionated for this account

Channels · Tilicho Labs
VoiceSMSApp chatWeb

Voice & channel orchestration, telephony, conversational execution, session/state, routing, integration build. Capability coverage validated during implementation.

Intelligence · Google Cloud
Gemini reasoningEnterprise groundingWorkflow agentsMulti-agent orchestrationGoverned actionsEvaluation & analytics
Systems · Optus
CRMChurn modelsOffer matrixBSSBillingNetwork opsIncident management

API access to these systems is the critical-path dependency.

Trust & languages
EnglishMandarinVietnameseArabicHindi

Identity-bound sessions, policy-bounded actions, 100% audit logging, human approvals at defined points, in-tenant intelligence.

Business case

The economics, with your numbers

Addressable monthly interactions1.8M
Seller assumption — replace in discovery
Current cost per interaction ($)$6.5
Industry benchmark scale — validate
Automation / assistance rate (%)55%
Seller assumption — pilot proves this
$11.7M
Current operating cost / mo
$73.1M
Modelled gross benefit / yr
0.0 mo
Payback on Scale
1742%
3-yr ROI (modelled)
Automated/assisted interactions per month990K
Modelled AI run-cost per month (usage + cloud, system estimate)$347K
New monthly operating cost$5.6M

All figures are modelling estimates from the labeled inputs above — nothing here is customer-provided yet. The pilot's first job is replacing these assumptions with Optus's measured baseline. Package price covers implementation only; recurring usage billed separately.

Recommended package

Scale — $100K implementation

Scale · $100K · A multi-channel production deployment10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows

Why this package for Optus: Retention plus inbound service recovery are two urgent workflows across voice, app and messaging; Scale's multi-channel scope fits, with governance rigor front and center given the incident history.

Included
  • 4–6 channels
  • 2–3 priority workflows
  • Multiple enterprise integrations
  • API credential & security setup
  • Advanced orchestration
  • Multilingual support
  • Agent Assist / human escalation
  • Production analytics
  • Expansion roadmap
Not included
  • ✕Usage & consumption (billed separately)
  • ✕Enterprise-wide governance build-out
  • ✕Multi-BU rollout
Recurring costs (separate from the package)

Packages cover implementation and integration only. Recurring costs are billed separately: Tilicho Labs platform usage (~$0.15/call-min indicative, usage only), Google Cloud consumption, telephony/carrier charges, managed operations, and support & optimization. No package includes unlimited usage.

Customer resources required
  • · API access + credentials for: CRM, Churn models, Offer matrix
  • · A named business owner for churn-risk retention and save desk
  • · Security review counterpart and policy sign-off (CRM scope)
  • · Baseline metrics for the pilot's success thresholds
Executive messages

What to say to whom

CEO

“The turnaround narrative needs operational proof, not advertising; service that answers instantly in five community languages is trust rebuilt where customers actually feel it — and a story to tell the regulator.”

CIO / CTO

“A governed agent platform with full audit trails supports the resilience posture ACMA now expects — and gives you consistent execution no surge-hired workforce can match.”

COO

“Australian contact-center labor is the region's most expensive; elastic agentic capacity cuts your largest variable cost while removing the peak-day capacity cliff your incidents keep exposing.”

Head of Customer Success & Retention

“Most port-outs today leave without a real save attempt; population-scale retention outreach with approved offers is the single highest-leverage number you can move this year.”

Chief Risk / Compliance Officer

“Privacy Act-aligned handling, Australian data-residency options, 100% interaction logging and human gates on offers — auditability designed for an operator under active regulatory scrutiny.”

CFO / Procurement

“At Australian cost-per-contact levels the automation delta is the region's largest; the pilot measures saved-subscriber value and cost reduction against your own baseline within a quarter.”

Outreach

Pre-built offer emails for Optus

Written from this account's own research — the strategic signal, the capability gap, the entry workflow, and the modelled economics — not a mail-merge template. Pick the moment and the persona, edit anything, then copy or open in your mail client.

Moment in the deal
Cold outreach — no prior conversation
Who it's addressed to
Cares about: The workflow itself and its daily failure modes
Register
Length
Draft — edit freely before sending
Open in mail client

Customer-safe by construction: drafts are composed only from customer-facing fields. Account tier, build-vs-buy classification, priority score, internal routing, and partner-commercial detail are not inputs to the composer, so they cannot appear in a draft. Money figures are always framed as modelled from the customer's own volumes. Read before sending — you own what goes out.

The pursuit

Tier 1 — immediate strategic pursuit

Why this tier

Australia's #2 telco is rebuilding customer trust after a historic run of crises — the 2022 data breach, the 2023 national outage and the 2025 triple-zero failure — making retention, reachability and consistent service execution existential priorities with board attention.

30 / 60 / 90-day plan
  • Day 0–30: Executive session with retention and CX leadership: baseline port-out and save-rate data, then scope a Scale deployment starting with the at-risk cohort ahead of the next contract-renewal wave.; confirm sponsor and baseline data access; validate: Current churn cohort sizes and save-desk coverage rates
  • Day 31–60: architecture & security review with the platform team; Tilicho Labs scoping on Voice + SMS; pilot scope signed
  • Day 61–90: Scale package kickoff; churn-risk retention and save desk pilot in build; success thresholds locked with the Head of Customer Success & Retention
Recommended next step

Executive session with retention and CX leadership: baseline port-out and save-rate data, then scope a Scale deployment starting with the at-risk cohort ahead of the next contract-renewal wave.

Entry: Churn-risk retention and save desk · Scale package · 10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows. Human fallback throughout; success thresholds agreed before build.

Start the pursuit

Research-based priority-account universe assembled from public information, market scale, communication volume, and solution fit. This is NOT an authoritative list of top Google Cloud customers; existing Google Cloud relationships are noted only where publicly reported. Validate every account with the account team before outreach.