JapanSecurities / wealth managementScale · $100K
Nomura Securities

The NISA generation meets the house of Nomura — agentic onboarding and service for the wealth pivot

The 2024 NISA expansion created Japan's largest-ever wave of first-time investors, and Nomura's strategic answer is fee-based wealth relationships — but advisors cannot economically serve small first-time accounts, and compliance rules mean automation must inform without advising; an agentic frontline that opens accounts conversationally, answers procedure and product-information questions within approved scripts, and books qualified prospects onto advisor calendars lets Nomura harvest the NISA generation now and grow them into advisory clients over decades.

Entry use case
Account opening and NISA onboarding desk
Expected outcome
Lift account-opening completion and NISA setup with guided conversational onboarding, measured on funnel conversion and advisor-referral quality.
Recommended next step
Workshop with wealth-management channel leadership and compliance jointly: define the suitability-safe script boundary, then scope a Scale pilot on NISA onboarding completion.
What we understand

Nomura Securities's operating reality

Nomura is Japan's largest securities firm, publicly executing a shift from brokerage commissions toward recurring fee-based wealth management.

Public fact

The new NISA regime from January 2024 drove record account openings and retail inflows across the industry — a generational on-ramp of first-time investors.

Public fact

Japanese securities regulation (FIEA suitability rules) strictly separates information provision from investment advice, defining hard boundaries any automation must respect.

Public fact

First-time NISA customers generate high volumes of procedural and definitional questions uneconomic for branch advisors to answer.

Reasoned inference

An aging wealthy client base needs patient servicing (inheritance of securities accounts, procedure support) that consumes advisor hours without generating advice value.

Reasoned inference

Onboarding abandonment among app-era prospects encountering brokerage KYC likely runs high and unmeasured against banking-app expectations.

Seller hypothesis — validate

Validate with the account team before outreach: Onboarding funnel volumes and abandonment points for NISA accounts · Compliance appetite for script-governed conversational information provision · Advisor capacity model and referral-quality economics · Internal digital programs and incumbent vendors in the retail stack

Build vs buy

Why we have a right to win here

Partner-led target

Technically capable but needs industry workflows, integration, acceleration, or managed operations

Evidence: Nomura has meaningful technology investments and digital ventures, but regulated retail conversational workflows in Japanese securities will be delivered with platform partners under compliance governance; the sale is suitability-safe conversation design, governance tooling and funnel speed — not raw AI capability Nomura would rather source.

Why they won't build the full stack: Internal build would put an unproven system directly against FIEA suitability boundaries — the riskiest possible place to learn; a partner platform with enforced script governance de-risks the compliance surface while delivering funnel lift inside the NISA window.

What management is signalling

Nomura's strategy publicly emphasizes growing recurring fee-based wealth-management revenue over transaction commissions, with retail-segment results improving on the shift.

Reported factFY2025 investor communications · 2025

GTM implication: Pitch funnel automation as the scale engine of the published strategy — holding small relationships economically until they mature into fee-based ones.

The new NISA regime drove record industry-wide account openings and inflows from January 2024.

Reported factpublic industry data and results commentary · 2024-2025

GTM implication: The acquisition window is now — position speed of deployment as strategy, not procurement detail.

What already exists (don't pitch this)
  • Nomura app and online trading channels
  • Nationwide branch and advisor network
  • NISA product suite and campaigns
  • Call centers for service and trading support
What customers still can't do end-to-end (pitch this)
  • →Conversational onboarding rescue at stall moments
  • →Scalable non-advisory information service within suitability rules
  • →Rubric-based advisor-appointment qualification
  • →Patient procedural support for the aging client base without consuming advisor hours
Opportunity map

Where agentic communications pays off first

WorkflowWhy it matters hereValueComplexitySpeedChannels
Account opening and NISA onboarding desk
Applications completed conversationally with documents validated in-flow and NISA designation explained within approved scripts; completion rates rise.
The NISA wave is a once-in-a-generation client-acquisition window; completion friction is the leak.
Friction today: Brokerage KYC and NISA designation steps confuse first-timers; applications stall; branch staff answer the same procedural questions daily.
App chatWebVoice
Service and product-information desk (non-advisory)
Information and procedures resolved within approved, suitability-safe scripts; anything advisory books a human advisor with context — the compliance boundary enforced by design.
Definitional and procedural questions dominate new-investor contact volume — automatable precisely because they are not advice.
Friction today: Every 'what is a tsumitate quota' call queues for staff who must carefully avoid advice while answering; handle times balloon.
VoiceApp chatWeb
Advisor-appointment qualification and inheritance-procedure support
Prospects qualified on rubric and booked to the right advisor; inheritance procedures guided with human gates — advisor time concentrates on advice.
Advisor hours are the scarce monetized resource; qualified calendars and reduced procedural load multiply their productivity.
Friction today: Advisors self-source meetings and absorb securities-inheritance paperwork support that generates no advice value.
VoiceWebApp chat
Watch the change

Account opening and NISA onboarding desk: today vs the agentic model

Scenario: A 31-year-old's NISA application stalls on the account-type selection at 10pm; the agent explains growth versus tsumitate quotas in plain, script-approved terms, completes the application with her ID validated in-flow, and — when she asks which fund she should pick — smoothly books a licensed advisor callback for Saturday morning: the compliance line held, the account opened, the advisory relationship begun.
Today
same interaction, two worlds
Agentic layer
Speed to first contact
hours–days
minutes, 24/7
Platform capability
Cost per contact
$13.50 median assisted
$1.84 median self-service
Benchmark
QA coverage
1–2% sampled
100% scored
Platform capability
Sources & assumptions
  • · Speed to first contact: Process design; conversion lift measured in pilot
  • · Cost per contact: Gartner customer service cost benchmarks, 2024
  • · QA coverage: Platform capability: every interaction logged and evaluated
  • · Gartner, customer service cost benchmarks (2024): $13.50 median assisted vs $1.84 self-service per contact
  • · McKinsey, digital-first collections research: 20–25% NPL reduction among leaders; up to 40% opex reduction with gen AI
  • · Baymard Institute: ~70% average cart abandonment (meta-analysis)
  • · IAMAI–Kantar via IBEF (2025): 900M+ Indian internet users; 98% consume Indic-language content
  • · LeadSquared and vendor funnel studies: 78% of students choose the first institution to respond (directional, vendor data)
  • · HDI / ITSM operator benchmarks: $15–25 per L1 ticket; 40–60% of L1 volume is resets/status (validate per customer)
  • · Conventional-flow wait times and volumes are typical operator patterns — assumptions to replace with the customer's own baseline
  • · Agentic-flow behaviors (context retention, 100% logging, in-line policy checks) are platform capabilities, not projections
Recommended solution

One integrated stack, opinionated for this account

Channels · Tilicho Labs
App chatWebVoice

Voice & channel orchestration, telephony, conversational execution, session/state, routing, integration build. Capability coverage validated during implementation.

Intelligence · Google Cloud
Gemini reasoningEnterprise groundingWorkflow agentsMulti-agent orchestrationGoverned actionsEvaluation & analytics
Systems · Nomura Securities
Onboarding/KYC workflowAccount systemsCRMKnowledge baseAdvisor calendarsInheritance workflow

API access to these systems is the critical-path dependency.

Trust & languages
JapaneseEnglish

Identity-bound sessions, policy-bounded actions, 100% audit logging, human approvals at defined points, in-tenant intelligence.

Business case

The economics, with your numbers

Addressable monthly interactions600K
Seller assumption — replace in discovery
Current cost per interaction ($)$7.0
Industry benchmark scale — validate
Automation / assistance rate (%)55%
Seller assumption — pilot proves this
$4.2M
Current operating cost / mo
$26.3M
Modelled gross benefit / yr
0.0 mo
Payback on Scale
1853%
3-yr ROI (modelled)
Automated/assisted interactions per month330K
Modelled AI run-cost per month (usage + cloud, system estimate)$115K
New monthly operating cost$2.0M

All figures are modelling estimates from the labeled inputs above — nothing here is customer-provided yet. The pilot's first job is replacing these assumptions with Nomura Securities's measured baseline. Package price covers implementation only; recurring usage billed separately.

Recommended package

Scale — $100K implementation

Scale · $100K · A multi-channel production deployment10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows

Why this package for Nomura Securities: Onboarding plus the service/information desk with strict suitability gates are two bounded workflows — Scale scope, with outreach expansion once compliance comfort is established.

Included
  • 4–6 channels
  • 2–3 priority workflows
  • Multiple enterprise integrations
  • API credential & security setup
  • Advanced orchestration
  • Multilingual support
  • Agent Assist / human escalation
  • Production analytics
  • Expansion roadmap
Not included
  • ✕Usage & consumption (billed separately)
  • ✕Enterprise-wide governance build-out
  • ✕Multi-BU rollout
Recurring costs (separate from the package)

Packages cover implementation and integration only. Recurring costs are billed separately: Tilicho Labs platform usage (~$0.15/call-min indicative, usage only), Google Cloud consumption, telephony/carrier charges, managed operations, and support & optimization. No package includes unlimited usage.

Customer resources required
  • · API access + credentials for: Onboarding/KYC workflow, Account systems, CRM
  • · A named business owner for account opening and nisa onboarding desk
  • · Security review counterpart and policy sign-off (Onboarding/KYC workflow scope)
  • · Baseline metrics for the pilot's success thresholds
Executive messages

What to say to whom

CEO (Wealth Management)

“The NISA generation is the future book of business arriving decades early; conversational onboarding and service is the only economic way to hold millions of small relationships until they grow into advisory ones.”

CIO / CTO

“A governed agent over onboarding, account and calendar systems with suitability boundaries enforced in the platform — bounded integration, complete conversation logs, no parallel advice surface.”

COO

“Branch staff answer the same definitional questions hundreds of times daily; script-governed automation absorbs that volume and returns your people to work that earns fees.”

Head of Retail Channels / Branch Network

“Your advisors' calendars fill with unqualified walk-ins while stalled applications leak silently; rubric-qualified bookings and conversational rescue fix both ends of the funnel.”

Chief Risk / Compliance Officer

“The advice boundary is enforced by design: approved scripts only, automatic advisory-referral on trigger phrases, human gates everywhere suitability applies, 100% logged — a stronger record than human small talk ever leaves.”

CFO / Procurement

“Cost per opened-and-funded account and advisor-hour productivity are the pilot's metrics, benchmarked on your own funnel — consumption pricing against the industry's biggest acquisition window.”

Outreach

Pre-built offer emails for Nomura Securities

Written from this account's own research — the strategic signal, the capability gap, the entry workflow, and the modelled economics — not a mail-merge template. Pick the moment and the persona, edit anything, then copy or open in your mail client.

Moment in the deal
Cold outreach — no prior conversation
Who it's addressed to
Cares about: The workflow itself and its daily failure modes
Register
Length
Draft — edit freely before sending
Open in mail client

Customer-safe by construction: drafts are composed only from customer-facing fields. Account tier, build-vs-buy classification, priority score, internal routing, and partner-commercial detail are not inputs to the composer, so they cannot appear in a draft. Money figures are always framed as modelled from the customer's own volumes. Read before sending — you own what goes out.

The pursuit

Tier 2 — high-potential incubation

Why this tier

Japan's largest brokerage is pivoting from transaction commissions to fee-based wealth management just as the new NISA regime floods the market with first-time investors — millions of service and onboarding conversations its advisor-centric model cannot economically hold.

Recommended next step

Workshop with wealth-management channel leadership and compliance jointly: define the suitability-safe script boundary, then scope a Scale pilot on NISA onboarding completion.

Entry: Account opening and NISA onboarding desk · Scale package · 10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows. Human fallback throughout; success thresholds agreed before build.

Start the pursuit

Research-based priority-account universe assembled from public information, market scale, communication volume, and solution fit. This is NOT an authoritative list of top Google Cloud customers; existing Google Cloud relationships are noted only where publicly reported. Validate every account with the account team before outreach.