VietnamMulti-chain retailScale · $100K
Mobile World Group (MWG)

Six thousand grocery stores and every phone in Vietnam: agentic service for MWG's retail machine

Give MWG an agentic layer for delivery and installation coordination, warranty and repair service, and Bach Hoa Xanh customer care in Vietnamese — extending its efficiency culture from stores into conversations.

Entry use case
Delivery, installation & warranty service
Expected outcome
Deflect delivery-status and warranty-status contacts in-channel, cut failed-delivery and missed-installation rates, and attribute the savings per order
Recommended next step
Quantify failed-delivery and missed-installation rates for one electronics region and pilot proactive Zalo coordination against that baseline.
What we understand

Mobile World Group (MWG)'s operating reality

MWG is Vietnam's largest retailer, operating TheGioiDiDong (phones), Dien May Xanh (electronics), Bach Hoa Xanh (groceries, 6,000+ stores), An Khang pharmacy, and the EraBlue electronics JV in Indonesia.

Public fact

After an aggressive 2023–24 store-rationalization program that closed hundreds of underperforming outlets, profitability rebounded sharply — net profit rose roughly 22-fold in 2024 and set a record again in 2025, with Bach Hoa Xanh reaching sustained store-level profitability.

Public fact

Electronics retail at MWG's scale generates enormous scheduled-touch volume: delivery windows, air-conditioner and appliance installation appointments, and warranty/repair status — each missed coordination doubling cost.

Reasoned inference

MWG is famously technology-strong internally (its in-house ERP and omnichannel systems are a case study in Vietnamese retail) — which makes it a partner-led rather than buy-led profile: it will integrate deeply and demand platform-grade APIs.

Reasoned inference

Bach Hoa Xanh's fresh-grocery model makes complaint velocity (freshness, substitutions, delivery timing) a brand-critical, high-volume service surface with thin-margin economics.

Reasoned inference

EraBlue's Indonesian growth could take the same platform cross-border, making a Vietnamese-Indonesian deployment a differentiated group-level story.

Seller hypothesis — validate

Validate with the account team before outreach: In-house ERP and scheduling-system API surface for integration · Current failed-delivery/missed-installation baselines · Whether MWG's internal tech team has a competing conversational build underway

Build vs buy

Why we have a right to win here

Partner-led target

Technically capable but needs industry workflows, integration, acceleration, or managed operations

Evidence: MWG builds serious internal systems (ERP, omnichannel) but its builds serve merchandising and logistics — it has never built communications infrastructure, and its efficiency culture favors buying proven capability where building adds no moat. Expect deep integration demands and a partner-led deployment its engineers co-own.

Why they won't build the full stack: Conversational AI platforms are not retail differentiation — delivery precision and price are. MWG's engineering hours are worth more extending the ERP moat than replicating a platform it can buy with usage economics; the rationalization-era discipline argues the same.

What management is signalling

After the 2023–24 store-rationalization program, MWG reported a ~22-fold profit rebound in 2024 and record net profit again in 2025 (~VND7.1 trillion, +89%), with Bach Hoa Xanh reaching sustained profitability.

Reported factFY2024 and FY2025 results · Feb 2026

GTM implication: Management's proven playbook is measurable efficiency — pitch conversation automation as the next rationalization lever, with per-order attribution.

What already exists (don't pitch this)
  • TheGioiDiDong / Dien May Xanh national electronics chains
  • Bach Hoa Xanh 6,000+ store grocery network with online ordering
  • Famed in-house ERP and omnichannel systems
  • Installation and delivery fleet operations
  • EraBlue JV in Indonesia
What customers still can't do end-to-end (pitch this)
  • →Proactive delivery/installation coordination at scale
  • →In-channel warranty and repair status
  • →Policy-bounded refund automation for grocery complaints
  • →Vietnamese voice automation
  • →Conversation-level cost attribution per order
Opportunity map

Where agentic communications pays off first

WorkflowWhy it matters hereValueComplexitySpeedChannels
Delivery & installation coordination
Slots confirmed and rescheduled in-channel on Zalo, proactive day-of coordination, installer ETAs pushed, failed-visit rates measured and attributed.
Appliance installation is the group's most expensive service motion; missed appointments and failed deliveries are direct margin loss.
Friction today: Delivery and installer scheduling runs on outbound calls; customers miss windows; reschedules loop through hotlines.
ZaloSMSVoice
Warranty & repair status service
Status grounded in the service-management system, proactive stage updates, pickup/return coordination in-channel.
Repair opacity is the biggest post-purchase trust killer in electronics retail and a heavy hotline driver.
Friction today: Repair-status answers require store or service-center checks; customers call repeatedly across a multi-week cycle.
ZaloVoiceIn-app chat
Bach Hoa Xanh customer care
Order-grounded resolution with policy-bounded refunds/credits in-channel, store-level quality patterns clustered and reported to ops.
Fresh-grocery complaints are high-frequency, low-value-per-ticket — viable only at self-service economics, but brand-critical in aggregate.
Friction today: Freshness and substitution complaints route to store staff and a general hotline with no order context.
ZaloIn-app chatVoice
Watch the change

Delivery, installation & warranty service: today vs the agentic model

Scenario: A Dien May Xanh customer's air-conditioner installation risks a missed afternoon window; she gets a proactive Zalo message, picks the evening slot, the installer's ETA follows automatically — and her warranty registration confirms in the same thread.
Today
same interaction, two worlds
Agentic layer
Contacts per delivery incident
3–4 across channels
1 proactive thread
Platform capability
Cart abandonment context
~70% average
recoverable via consent-based outreach
Benchmark
Cost per contact
$13.50 median assisted
$1.84 median self-service
Benchmark
QA coverage
1–2% sampled
100% scored
Platform capability
Sources & assumptions
  • · Contacts per delivery incident: Process design: exception detected before contact
  • · Cart abandonment context: Baymard Institute meta-analysis
  • · Cost per contact: Gartner customer service cost benchmarks, 2024
  • · QA coverage: Platform capability: every interaction logged and evaluated
  • · Gartner, customer service cost benchmarks (2024): $13.50 median assisted vs $1.84 self-service per contact
  • · McKinsey, digital-first collections research: 20–25% NPL reduction among leaders; up to 40% opex reduction with gen AI
  • · Baymard Institute: ~70% average cart abandonment (meta-analysis)
  • · IAMAI–Kantar via IBEF (2025): 900M+ Indian internet users; 98% consume Indic-language content
  • · LeadSquared and vendor funnel studies: 78% of students choose the first institution to respond (directional, vendor data)
  • · HDI / ITSM operator benchmarks: $15–25 per L1 ticket; 40–60% of L1 volume is resets/status (validate per customer)
  • · Conventional-flow wait times and volumes are typical operator patterns — assumptions to replace with the customer's own baseline
  • · Agentic-flow behaviors (context retention, 100% logging, in-line policy checks) are platform capabilities, not projections
Recommended solution

One integrated stack, opinionated for this account

Channels · Tilicho Labs
ZaloSMSVoiceIn-app chat

Voice & channel orchestration, telephony, conversational execution, session/state, routing, integration build. Capability coverage validated during implementation.

Intelligence · Google Cloud
Gemini reasoningEnterprise groundingWorkflow agentsMulti-agent orchestrationGoverned actionsEvaluation & analytics
Systems · Mobile World Group (MWG)
Order managementLogistics/installer schedulingIn-house ERPService/repair managementERPBHX order platformRefund/credit engine

API access to these systems is the critical-path dependency.

Trust & languages
VietnameseEnglish

Identity-bound sessions, policy-bounded actions, 100% audit logging, human approvals at defined points, in-tenant intelligence.

Business case

The economics, with your numbers

Addressable monthly interactions2.5M
Seller assumption — replace in discovery
Current cost per interaction ($)$0.6
Industry benchmark scale — validate
Automation / assistance rate (%)55%
Seller assumption — pilot proves this
$1.5M
Current operating cost / mo
$4.1M
Modelled gross benefit / yr
0.3 mo
Payback on Scale
70%
3-yr ROI (modelled)
Automated/assisted interactions per month1.4M
Modelled AI run-cost per month (usage + cloud, system estimate)$481K
New monthly operating cost$1.2M

All figures are modelling estimates from the labeled inputs above — nothing here is customer-provided yet. The pilot's first job is replacing these assumptions with Mobile World Group (MWG)'s measured baseline. Package price covers implementation only; recurring usage billed separately.

Recommended package

Scale — $100K implementation

Scale · $100K · A multi-channel production deployment10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows

Why this package for Mobile World Group (MWG): Delivery/installation coordination, warranty service, and grocery care span three chains on shared logistics and CRM systems — a multi-workflow deployment amortized across the group's order volume.

Included
  • 4–6 channels
  • 2–3 priority workflows
  • Multiple enterprise integrations
  • API credential & security setup
  • Advanced orchestration
  • Multilingual support
  • Agent Assist / human escalation
  • Production analytics
  • Expansion roadmap
Not included
  • ✕Usage & consumption (billed separately)
  • ✕Enterprise-wide governance build-out
  • ✕Multi-BU rollout
Recurring costs (separate from the package)

Packages cover implementation and integration only. Recurring costs are billed separately: Tilicho Labs platform usage (~$0.15/call-min indicative, usage only), Google Cloud consumption, telephony/carrier charges, managed operations, and support & optimization. No package includes unlimited usage.

Customer resources required
  • · API access + credentials for: Order management, Logistics/installer scheduling, In-house ERP
  • · A named business owner for delivery, installation & warranty service
  • · Security review counterpart and policy sign-off (Order management scope)
  • · Baseline metrics for the pilot's success thresholds
Executive messages

What to say to whom

CEO / Chairman

“MWG's rebound came from ruthless efficiency; conversations are the next inefficiency frontier. An agentic layer applies the same store-level discipline to every delivery, installation, and complaint — measured per order, chain by chain.”

CIO / CTO

“Your in-house ERP is the moat; the conversational layer plugs into it rather than replacing anything. Partner-led delivery with your engineers owning integration gets platform capability without diverting them from core systems.”

COO

“Installer utilization rises as missed windows fall, warranty hotline volume collapses into proactive status, and BHX complaints resolve in-channel before they become store-front confrontations.”

Head of Supply Chain / Service Operations

“Failed-delivery and repeat-repair-contact rates become instrumented KPIs with attribution — the operational dashboard extends into the conversation layer.”

Chief Risk / Compliance Officer

“Refund and goodwill policy applied identically across three chains with Decree 13-compliant consent and complete logs — brand protection at grocery-complaint velocity.”

CFO

“The business case is per-order arithmetic: avoided truck rolls, recovered installer slots, and deflected hotline minutes at sub-dollar interaction cost — auditable in the same weekly rhythm you run the chains.”

Outreach

Pre-built offer emails for Mobile World Group (MWG)

Written from this account's own research — the strategic signal, the capability gap, the entry workflow, and the modelled economics — not a mail-merge template. Pick the moment and the persona, edit anything, then copy or open in your mail client.

Moment in the deal
Cold outreach — no prior conversation
Who it's addressed to
Cares about: The workflow itself and its daily failure modes
Register
Length
Draft — edit freely before sending
Open in mail client

Customer-safe by construction: drafts are composed only from customer-facing fields. Account tier, build-vs-buy classification, priority score, internal routing, and partner-commercial detail are not inputs to the composer, so they cannot appear in a draft. Money figures are always framed as modelled from the customer's own volumes. Read before sending — you own what goes out.

The pursuit

Tier 2 — high-potential incubation

Why this tier

Vietnam's largest retailer — TheGioiDiDong and Dien May Xanh electronics chains, the now-profitable Bach Hoa Xanh grocery network at 6,000+ stores, and Indonesia's EraBlue JV — with famously strong in-house tech and a post-rationalization efficiency mandate: delivery, warranty, and installation service volume at national scale.

Recommended next step

Quantify failed-delivery and missed-installation rates for one electronics region and pilot proactive Zalo coordination against that baseline.

Entry: Delivery, installation & warranty service · Scale package · 10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows. Human fallback throughout; success thresholds agreed before build.

Start the pursuit

Research-based priority-account universe assembled from public information, market scale, communication volume, and solution fit. This is NOT an authoritative list of top Google Cloud customers; existing Google Cloud relationships are noted only where publicly reported. Validate every account with the account team before outreach.