KoreaBankingScale · $100K
Hana Bank

Korea's FX bank, every customer's language — agentic service for Hana One Q and the foreign-resident franchise

Hana built its franchise on FX and cross-border money movement, which hands it Korea's most multilingual service base — foreign workers, students and businesses banking in a dozen languages — and an agentic frontline that resolves remittance, FX and account servicing in the customer's own language extends Hana's signature strength to the channel where it is weakest today.

Entry use case
Remittance and FX servicing line (rates, tracking, documentation)
Expected outcome
Resolve remittance-status and FX inquiries in-conversation across languages, cutting repeat contacts and freeing specialists for advisory work.
Recommended next step
Remittance-line workshop with global-business and operations leadership: baseline language mix and repeat-contact rates, then pilot the remittance-status workflow in the top three foreign-customer languages.
What we understand

Hana Bank's operating reality

Hana Bank anchors Hana Financial Group and holds a leading position in Korean FX and cross-border remittances, historically rooted in the Korea Exchange Bank merger.

Public fact

Hana runs dedicated services for foreign residents — multilingual banking support and remittance products for Korea's growing foreign-worker and student population.

Public fact

Hana One Q is the group's flagship app with broad self-service, but remittance exceptions, documentation questions and FX timing inquiries still generate heavy assisted volume.

Reasoned inference

Korea's foreign-resident population has passed two million and keeps growing, expanding a service base that Korean-only automation cannot reach.

Public fact

PIPA plus FX-transaction reporting rules make cross-border servicing conversations compliance-sensitive — an auditability argument for governed automation.

Reasoned inference

Remittance-status and documentation calls likely spike around holidays in origin-country calendars, straining fixed multilingual staffing.

Seller hypothesis — validate

Validate with the account team before outreach: Actual remittance-servicing volumes and language distribution · Hana Financial Group AI initiatives and preferred-vendor positions · FSS/cloud outsourcing route for cross-border conversation processing · Peak-pattern data around origin-country holiday calendars

Build vs buy

Why we have a right to win here

Partner-led target

Technically capable but needs industry workflows, integration, acceleration, or managed operations

Evidence: Hana Financial Group invests seriously in digital (Hana One Q, group data initiatives) but has no public program for multilingual conversational-AI infrastructure; its integration capacity is real, so the motion is partner-led — Hana owns systems and journeys, the platform supplies language breadth and governed voice automation.

Why they won't build the full stack: A dozen-language voice frontline at banking-compliance grade is precisely the capability global platforms amortize across customers and a single bank cannot economically build; Hana's engineering is better spent on the payments and FX rails that actually differentiate it.

What management is signalling

Hana Financial Group's investor narrative emphasizes fee-income growth, FX/cross-border strength and cost discipline under the Korean Value-up program.

Inferencerecent investor communications (validate) · 2025-2026

GTM implication: Tie multilingual servicing automation to fee-business growth: better remittance experience compounds the franchise the market already values Hana for.

Korea's foreign-resident population growth keeps expanding the cross-border customer segment Korean banks compete for.

Reported factpublic demographic reporting · 2025

GTM implication: Position language-complete service as the land-grab move in the fastest-growing retail segment in Korean banking.

What already exists (don't pitch this)
  • Hana One Q app with broad self-service
  • Dedicated foreign-customer banking services and remittance products
  • KakaoTalk channels and IVR estate
  • Group digital and data investments
What customers still can't do end-to-end (pitch this)
  • →Multilingual voice automation beyond Korean and English
  • →Proactive remittance-status outreach as transfers progress
  • →Transactional depth for servicing tasks outside the app
  • →Cross-channel context between app, branch and phone for foreign customers
Opportunity map

Where agentic communications pays off first

WorkflowWhy it matters hereValueComplexitySpeedChannels
Remittance and FX servicing line
Status, rates and documentation resolved in the customer's language with proactive updates as transfers progress; specialists handle exceptions only.
Cross-border money movement is Hana's franchise; every stuck remittance is a trust moment in the customer's most stressful financial task.
Friction today: Status and documentation questions arrive in a dozen languages; multilingual staffing is thin and expensive; repeat calls pile up while transfers clear.
VoiceApp chatKakaoTalk
Foreign-resident onboarding and account servicing
Guided onboarding and servicing in the customer's language with documents validated in-flow; completion rises, branch load falls.
The foreign-customer franchise is a growth engine competitors cannot easily copy; onboarding friction in unfamiliar Korean processes is its biggest leak.
Friction today: Document requirements confuse non-Korean speakers; visa-status and eligibility questions need staff who speak the customer's language.
App chatVoiceWeb
SME banking service desk
SME servicing answered around the clock with live status from trade and payments systems; relationship managers reclaim advisory time.
Hana's SME base generates payments, limit and trade-finance-status inquiries that queue behind retail volume.
Friction today: Business owners call outside business hours; trade-document status requires specialist callbacks.
VoiceApp chat
Watch the change

Remittance and FX servicing line (rates, tracking, documentation): today vs the agentic model

Scenario: A Vietnamese factory worker in Ansan calls at 9pm about a remittance to Hai Phong that hasn't landed; the agent answers in Vietnamese, traces the transfer in the payments platform, explains the beneficiary-bank hold, schedules a proactive update for the moment it clears and confirms the better FX window for his next transfer — trust in Hana's core franchise, kept in his own language.
Today
same interaction, two worlds
Agentic layer
First-contact resolution
deferred via tickets
in-conversation actions
Platform capability
Cost per contact
$13.50 median assisted
$1.84 median self-service
Benchmark
QA coverage
1–2% sampled
100% scored
Platform capability
Sources & assumptions
  • · First-contact resolution: Process design: agent acts in systems of record
  • · Cost per contact: Gartner customer service cost benchmarks, 2024
  • · QA coverage: Platform capability: every interaction logged and evaluated
  • · Gartner, customer service cost benchmarks (2024): $13.50 median assisted vs $1.84 self-service per contact
  • · McKinsey, digital-first collections research: 20–25% NPL reduction among leaders; up to 40% opex reduction with gen AI
  • · Baymard Institute: ~70% average cart abandonment (meta-analysis)
  • · IAMAI–Kantar via IBEF (2025): 900M+ Indian internet users; 98% consume Indic-language content
  • · LeadSquared and vendor funnel studies: 78% of students choose the first institution to respond (directional, vendor data)
  • · HDI / ITSM operator benchmarks: $15–25 per L1 ticket; 40–60% of L1 volume is resets/status (validate per customer)
  • · Conventional-flow wait times and volumes are typical operator patterns — assumptions to replace with the customer's own baseline
  • · Agentic-flow behaviors (context retention, 100% logging, in-line policy checks) are platform capabilities, not projections
Recommended solution

One integrated stack, opinionated for this account

Channels · Tilicho Labs
VoiceApp chatKakaoTalkWeb

Voice & channel orchestration, telephony, conversational execution, session/state, routing, integration build. Capability coverage validated during implementation.

Intelligence · Google Cloud
Gemini reasoningEnterprise groundingWorkflow agentsMulti-agent orchestrationGoverned actionsEvaluation & analytics
Systems · Hana Bank
Payments/remittance platformCore bankingFX systemsOnboarding/KYCDocument managementTrade financePaymentsCRM

API access to these systems is the critical-path dependency.

Trust & languages
KoreanEnglish

Identity-bound sessions, policy-bounded actions, 100% audit logging, human approvals at defined points, in-tenant intelligence.

Business case

The economics, with your numbers

Addressable monthly interactions1.1M
Seller assumption — replace in discovery
Current cost per interaction ($)$4.0
Industry benchmark scale — validate
Automation / assistance rate (%)55%
Seller assumption — pilot proves this
$4.4M
Current operating cost / mo
$26.5M
Modelled gross benefit / yr
0.0 mo
Payback on Scale
1028%
3-yr ROI (modelled)
Automated/assisted interactions per month605K
Modelled AI run-cost per month (usage + cloud, system estimate)$212K
New monthly operating cost$2.2M

All figures are modelling estimates from the labeled inputs above — nothing here is customer-provided yet. The pilot's first job is replacing these assumptions with Hana Bank's measured baseline. Package price covers implementation only; recurring usage billed separately.

Recommended package

Scale — $100K implementation

Scale · $100K · A multi-channel production deployment10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows

Why this package for Hana Bank: Multilingual remittance servicing plus SME account servicing are two bounded workflows over core and payments integrations — Scale scope with a distinctive language-depth requirement that stresses exactly what the platform does best.

Included
  • 4–6 channels
  • 2–3 priority workflows
  • Multiple enterprise integrations
  • API credential & security setup
  • Advanced orchestration
  • Multilingual support
  • Agent Assist / human escalation
  • Production analytics
  • Expansion roadmap
Not included
  • ✕Usage & consumption (billed separately)
  • ✕Enterprise-wide governance build-out
  • ✕Multi-BU rollout
Recurring costs (separate from the package)

Packages cover implementation and integration only. Recurring costs are billed separately: Tilicho Labs platform usage (~$0.15/call-min indicative, usage only), Google Cloud consumption, telephony/carrier charges, managed operations, and support & optimization. No package includes unlimited usage.

Customer resources required
  • · API access + credentials for: Payments/remittance platform, Core banking, FX systems
  • · A named business owner for remittance and fx servicing line (rates, tracking, documentation)
  • · Security review counterpart and policy sign-off (Payments/remittance platform scope)
  • · Baseline metrics for the pilot's success thresholds
Executive messages

What to say to whom

CEO

“Hana's identity is cross-border banking; serving every remittance customer in their own language at any hour is that identity made operational — a franchise moat competitors with Korean-only service cannot cross.”

CIO / CTO

“One governed agent layer above payments, FX and core systems delivers a dozen languages from a single deployment — no multilingual staffing model can match that architecture, and it benchmarks cleanly against any internal build.”

COO

“Multilingual agents are the scarcest, most expensive staff in your centers; elastic language capacity removes your hardest hiring problem while holiday remittance spikes stop melting queues.”

Head of Global / Foreign Customer Business

“The foreign-resident franchise grows with Korea's demographics; onboarding and servicing in the customer's language is the single biggest conversion and retention lever you control.”

Chief Risk / Compliance Officer

“FX and remittance conversations carry reporting obligations; 100% logged, script-governed interactions in every language provide compliance evidence sampled QA cannot — PIPA-aligned throughout.”

CFO / Procurement

“Multilingual service today costs a premium per contact; the pilot measures per-contact cost and repeat-call reduction on the remittance line against your own baseline, usage billed on consumption.”

Outreach

Pre-built offer emails for Hana Bank

Written from this account's own research — the strategic signal, the capability gap, the entry workflow, and the modelled economics — not a mail-merge template. Pick the moment and the persona, edit anything, then copy or open in your mail client.

Moment in the deal
Cold outreach — no prior conversation
Who it's addressed to
Cares about: The workflow itself and its daily failure modes
Register
Length
Draft — edit freely before sending
Open in mail client

Customer-safe by construction: drafts are composed only from customer-facing fields. Account tier, build-vs-buy classification, priority score, internal routing, and partner-commercial detail are not inputs to the composer, so they cannot appear in a draft. Money figures are always framed as modelled from the customer's own volumes. Read before sending — you own what goes out.

The pursuit

Tier 2 — high-potential incubation

Why this tier

Korea's leading FX and cross-border bank inside Hana Financial Group, with the Hana One Q app estate, a large SME franchise and the country's strongest foreign-customer banking business — a distinctive multilingual service problem no Korean rival shares at the same scale.

Recommended next step

Remittance-line workshop with global-business and operations leadership: baseline language mix and repeat-contact rates, then pilot the remittance-status workflow in the top three foreign-customer languages.

Entry: Remittance and FX servicing line (rates, tracking, documentation) · Scale package · 10–14 weeks to production across priority workflows. Human fallback throughout; success thresholds agreed before build.

Start the pursuit

Research-based priority-account universe assembled from public information, market scale, communication volume, and solution fit. This is NOT an authoritative list of top Google Cloud customers; existing Google Cloud relationships are noted only where publicly reported. Validate every account with the account team before outreach.